skip to main content
US FlagAn official website of the United States government
dot gov icon
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
https lock icon
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( lock ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Search for: All records

Creators/Authors contains: "Antos, John M"

Note: When clicking on a Digital Object Identifier (DOI) number, you will be taken to an external site maintained by the publisher. Some full text articles may not yet be available without a charge during the embargo (administrative interval).
What is a DOI Number?

Some links on this page may take you to non-federal websites. Their policies may differ from this site.

  1. Abstract Bacterial sortases are a family of cysteine transpeptidases in Gram‐positive bacteria of which sortase A (SrtA) enzymes are responsible for ligating proteins to the peptidoglycan layer of the cell surface. Engineered versions of sortases are also used in sortase‐mediated ligation (SML) strategies for a variety of protein engineering applications. Although a versatile tool, substrate recognition byStaphylococcus aureusSrtA (saSrtA), the most commonly utilized enzyme in SML, is stringent and relies on an LPXTG pentapeptide motif. Previous structural studies revealed that the requirement of a glycine in the binding motif may be due to potential steric hindrance of amino acids possessing a β‐carbon by W194, a tryptophan located in the β7‐β8 loop of the enzyme. Here, we measured the effect of seven single point mutants of W194 (A, D, F, G, N, S, Y) saSrtA using a FRET‐based activity assay. We found that while the LPXTG motif remains a requirement for initial proteolytic cleavage, the nucleophile specificity of our variants is altered. In particular, W194A and W194S saSrtA recognize a D‐Ala nucleophile and are able to perform ligation reactions. Notably, an LPXT(D‐Ala) peptide was not cleaved by either mutant enzyme. We hypothesize that these variants may potentially be utilized to develop an irreversible sortase‐mediated reaction. Taken together, this experiment reveals new insight into sortase specificity and possible future SML strategies. 
    more » « less
    Free, publicly-accessible full text available December 1, 2025
  2. Free, publicly-accessible full text available April 1, 2026
  3. Vogelet al.reveals the stereochemical basis of alternative substrate cleavage byS. pyogenesSrtA for ligands with a P1′ Leu residue. The substrate adopts puckered alternative binding, whereby cleavage occurs between the P1′ and P2′ positions. 
    more » « less
  4. Gram-positive bacteria are some of the earliest known life forms, diverging from gram-negative bacteria 2 billion years ago. These organisms utilize sortase enzymes to attach proteins to their peptidoglycan cell wall, a structural feature that distinguishes the two types of bacteria. The transpeptidase activity of sortases make them an important tool in protein engineering applications, e.g., in sortase-mediated ligations or sortagging. However, due to relatively low catalytic efficiency, there are ongoing efforts to create better sortase variants for these uses. Here, we use bioinformatics tools, principal component analysis and ancestral sequence reconstruction, in combination with protein biochemistry, to analyze natural sequence variation in these enzymes. Principal component analysis on the sortase superfamily distinguishes previously described classes and identifies regions of relatively high sequence variation in structurally-conserved loops within each sortase family, including those near the active site. Using ancestral sequence reconstruction, we determined sequences of ancestral Staphylococcus and Streptococcus Class A sortase proteins. Enzyme assays revealed that the ancestral Streptococcus enzyme is relatively active and shares similar sequence variation with other Class A Streptococcus sortases. Taken together, we highlight how natural sequence variation can be utilized to investigate this important protein family, arguing that these and similar techniques may be used to discover or design sortases with increased catalytic efficiency and/or selectivity for sortase-mediated ligation experiments. 
    more » « less
  5. van der Wel, Patrick (Ed.)
    A significant number of proteins possess sizable intrinsically disordered regions (IDRs). Due to the dynamic nature of IDRs, NMR spectroscopy is often the tool of choice for characterizing these segments. However, the application of NMR to IDRs is often hindered by their instability, spectral overlap and resonance assignment difficulties. Notably, these challenges increase considerably with the size of the IDR. In response to these issues, here we report the use of sortase-mediated ligation (SML) for segmental isotopic labeling of IDR-containing samples. Specifically, we have developed a ligation strategy involving a key segment of the large IDR and adjacent folded headpiece domain comprising the C-terminus of A . thaliana villin 4 (AtVLN4). This procedure significantly reduces the complexity of NMR spectra and enables group identification of signals arising from the labeled IDR fragment, a process we refer to as segmental assignment . The validity of our segmental assignment approach is corroborated by backbone residue-specific assignment of the IDR using a minimal set of standard heteronuclear NMR methods. Using segmental assignment, we further demonstrate that the IDR region adjacent to the headpiece exhibits nonuniform spectral alterations in response to temperature. Subsequent residue-specific characterization revealed two segments within the IDR that responded to temperature in markedly different ways. Overall, this study represents an important step toward the selective labeling and probing of target segments within much larger IDR contexts. Additionally, the approach described offers significant savings in NMR recording time, a valuable advantage for the study of unstable IDRs, their binding interfaces, and functional mechanisms. 
    more » « less
  6. null (Ed.)